Smoke Without Fire is EASY ±

By 30 April 2017Z UNCATEGORISED
header

Smoke Without Fire is EASY (x±)

Published on 30th August 2017
Joseph-S-R-de-Saram

Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM
459

‘There are but two powers in the world, the sword and the mind. In the long run the sword is always beaten by the mind.‘ – Napoleon Bonaparte

Chemistry 101

The reaction equation between ammonia (NH3) and hydrochloric acid (HCl) is written as follows: NH3+HCl=NH4Cl. Ammonia is a weak base that reacts with hydrochloric acid, forming a compound called ammonium chloride.

During this chemical reaction, hydrochloric acid donates a proton to ammonia, meaning the former compound acts as a Bronsted-Lowry acid, while the latter is a Bronsted-Lowry base.

Visually, smoke is produced but there is no fire!!

The Classic Phrase(s)

US – “Where there’s smoke, there’s fire.”

UK – “There’s no smoke without fire.”

This is the meaning:-

There's no smoke without fire

uk saying us where there's smoke, there's fire ​ If unpleasant things are said about someone or something, there is probably a good reason for it: She says the accusations are not true, but there's no smoke without fire.....

People go around feeding off the negativity of the lies that they themselves have created to attempt to destroy everything. People in the US/UK/HK must be wondering how grotesquely stupid people in LK/AU/SG are. However after a while they too would be getting concerned and that means the Tortious Interference and Injurious Falsehoods would be working because of the [flawed] ‘No smoke without fire’ concept.

But the jurisdiction of the UK is enlivened which clearly helps my causes since I do not need to work with retarded and/or two-faced lawyers in Australasia!

The Actual Position

As my evidence on LinkedIn demonstrates, my line of work plus the messes adversaries get into means they have to file perjurious affidavits, bogus ex-parte applications and engage in smear campaigns.

It is clear that these are simply Argumentum Ad Hominem attacks to cause massive commercial losses as well as to pervert the course of justice.

I have information confirming that Melbourne Fraudsters and Edward de Saram are behind this since the very early evidence demonstrates it was their fraudulent foundations. Sure they have now recruited fools to their ranks and it is the fools (law enforcement included) that have been manipulated and this is how it appears ‘official’ and ‘genuine’.

I can even demonstrate that forensically too and virtually every call I have these days is about the fact that either (a) my parents are ‘good’ people or (b) everyone telling me ‘you don’t have evidence’ 🙂

Actually I obviously have evidence which is why my own confidence is rising rapidly despite heart issues, so I welcome the mercury rising. All the parties covering each other irrationally confirms how deep this goes!

Adversaries Need the Veil of Secrecy

The modus operandi of the parties is to produce unchallenged statements – that means circulating propaganda, stealing evidence modifying it and then placing their dense/fraudulent interpretations with it.

Producing misleading affidavits for courts which are unusually emotive in nature or just being hostile (because that is the agreed Lawyer’s Construct) is blatantly fraudulent. But the ‘story’ reads well, just like Star Wars or Harry Potter.

When parties demonstrate this unusually hostile behaviour, all at the same time and using the same signature themes (which are all flawed) then they only link themselves to their fraud and each other, and their conspiratorial nature is patently obvious.

Science Homework

This reminds me of the time that I deliberately made a mistake on my own science homework in Mr Wilson’s class in January 1983 (I was 10yrs old). I then provided my exercise book (if you remember what they were) to one classmate who bullied me for it. The bully assumed that I would not make any deliberate mistakes and therefore since I was invariably getting straight As, my template was solid,

When Mr David Wilson returned the books after marking, five people had the identical incorrect answer for one of the questions (!) and in fact the identical incorrect answer was nothing close to the correct answer.

Mr Wilson did not inform my peers in Elements ‘A’. At the end of the class he privately asked me why I had made a deliberate mistake and I responded ‘I wanted to see how lazy and desperate my classmates are’ 🙂

Stealth Mode

But the really interesting thing is that whilst I have elucidated what is going on from forensic science, I have not been provided even with one document containing the [latest] lies. Of course I have previous documents.

The perpetrators need the ‘cover of darkness’ in which to propagate their garbage. Their ‘veil of secrecy’ is their most powerful tool because if they cannot get their lies in at the start and obtain an unfair advantage that way, then they will be certainly exposed and obviously finished at a later point in time.

Demonising me as a criminal serves to give them a ‘cloak’ but actually since there is no criminal case that can possibly succeed it is nothing more than ‘wind and piss’.

Furthermore schadenfreude (the deriving of pleasure from the misfortune of others) gives them a sense of elation and all the fools who are part of their cabal are actually on the receiving end of litigation and/or pending litigation from me.

Additionally any privilege which they believe arises from their ‘common interest’ is easy to set aside on the basis of their perversions of the course of justice and criminal conspiracy. And the more parties are part of the conspiracy then it is easier to identify members of the cabal and make one or two ‘flip’.

Joe is Open and Transparent

Unlike the perpetrators, I can be Open and Transparent because I HAVE EVIDENCE and I AM RIGHT. Many of my articles on LinkedIn go to the heart of that which I am being accused of or unfounded allegations made against me.

I have elucidated these from examining forensic evidence and observing that which is occurring around me. My conclusions are NOT derived from mens rea or a guilty mind. In fact if I were guilty of something then I would not be prejudicing my own case by drawing attention to my ‘crimes’ on LinkedIn 🙂

Spectacular Injurious Falsehoods and Parallel Constructions

As such they are not concerns and this entire matter is one of defamation in which a criminal slant is produced in order to try and recreate the mess that journalists caused me in 2000.

Perhaps the fools think that their attempts to isolate me will make me more vulnerable – actually they have done me a kind of favour as I am shielded from parties who do not have my interests at heart. It has pushed me to get my head down and focus on data recovery – which I have been working on of course despite serious heart issues.

Various parties such as my parents have told me to ‘move on’ and ‘draw a line’ – these are merely diversionary tactics and fancy terms for ‘ignore the case against you’ and ‘do not pursue the perpetrators’.

“Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it”

The source of the Big Lie technique is this passage, taken from Chapter 10 of James Murphy‘s translation of Mein Kampf:

All this was inspired by the principle—which is quite true within itself—that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods.

It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying.— Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, vol. I, ch. X [1]

Psychological Basis – The False Analogy

This must surely be a classic, two entirely different scenarios:-

(a) Payment Delays from 1998 to 2000, which was actually nonsense caused by HMCE who was on the wrong end of a case from me, and my involvement in clandestine work and Money Laundering Projects and Fake Banks;

(b) Payment Delays in the last few years, which are actually due to a SGD 27,500 operation in Singapore in 2011 for Obstructive Sleep Apnoea, Data Losses, Coronary Artery Disease and a Heart Attack on 18 May 2013, and of course the Tortious Interference and Injurious Falsehoods of the Melbourne Fraudsters, who are trying so desperately to further the fraud of their fraudulently-obtained judgement by recruitment of ‘witnesses’ who are not ‘disinterested’ as well as their smear campaigns.

The existence of ‘Payment Delays’ does not mean a ‘modus operandi’ and/or ‘prior criminality’, but the foregoing conclusions are completely incorrect and logically flawed.

The False Analogy works by ignorant parties reviewing the end result and determining that the causative agent and/or response to the causative agent was/is the same. The way to propagate the effect is to quickly get many people involved, and validate the purported facts against the statements of others who appear in the ‘same boat’ rather than independently ascertaining all the facts (including the actual ones from me) before attempting to conclude anything.

Psychological Basis – The Straw man

This is the easiest to effect – my legal arguments and life are extremely complex so the retards around me just need to open their mouths and incorrectly summarise complex matters so that they can process them, propagating their flawed conclusions along the way which then reinforce their plausibility.

This has happened repeatedly in various legal cases and reflects the lack of class by opposing counsel (as well as my own) because the latter are just not bright enough to understand BUT are too proud to admit it. If they had simply been honest with me about their ignorance then things would have been different and they would not be about to get sued 🙂

For ALL the cases going forward I will be physically present in court and then we can see the correct result.

Psychological Basis – The False Dichotomy

This is another classic which is prevalent in this part of the world. The [flawed] conclusion is based upon the inability of the viewer to allow two opposing concepts to co-exist.

What is Dichotomous Thinking's Link to Borderline Personality?

Dichotomous Thinking does not require a link to BPD as the prevalence of this type thought process in Australasia because of GroupThink autocatalyses and therefore exacerbates the flaw.

It works particularly well against me in my present location because of the Asian culture of ‘don’t question the parents, don’t question the teacher, don’t question law enforcement’…

The Dogs May Bark but the Rhodium Juggernaut Rolls On

So despite the actual perpetrators trying their hardest to break my spirit and win, it just will not happen for three simple reasons:-

(a) Investigations do not phase me and litigation is my favourite indoor sport – I have the intellect to identify and crush the perpetrators, having recovered around 15% of forensic evidence so far. As I have stated previously I can collapse the entire case against me forensically;

(b) The ongoing lies around me is akin to JTRIG operations and having identified PSYOPS very early such harassment has absolutely no effect, especially when I have already stated that long-standing Asset Protection Mechanisms are in place which can withstand Mareva Injunctions;

(c) I AM THE ONE WHO IS RIGHT.

However in matters such as these I cannot sit around letting parties say what they like – in fact from 01 May 2017 there are new lawyers engaged to give these fools a good hammering 🙂

Joseph-S-R-de-Saram

Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM
RHODIUM GROUP

Further resources