‘Rhodium Reiderstvo’ – Grabbing Assets Instead of Pussies

By 31 January 2018KEY ARTICLES
rhodium-reiderstvo-grabbing-assets-instead-of-pussies-joseph-de-saram-rhodium-linkedin

'Rhodium Reiderstvo' - Grabbing Assets Instead of Pussies ±

Published on 31st January 2018
Joseph-S-R-de-Saram

Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM
993

Enter more text here

I refer to the this article about Rendition:-

Joe's Rendition was a Military Intelligence Operation

Please add me to your connections and read other unusual articles relating to Information Security, Forensics, and Fundamental Human Rights...
Joe's Rendition was a Military Intelligence Operation

Marking the Audio Track for Future Reference

As I have specified in previous articles that I used certain phrases to deliberately ‘mark the audio track’ with various parties. Given the call interception in these scenarios, having my concerns (at the time) recorded by the interceptors as well as me is perfect for evidentiary materials.

This single call is SO IMPORTANT because the entire call is essentially me marking the audio track ! No wonders the pricks deleted it !!

20150915 Call with Peters and Peters

In the above article I have used the phrase:-

JDS – “but this cloak and dagger approach is causing massive amounts of losses.

Bare in mind the preceding phrases in the conversation were:-

JDS – “Hmm I don’t know whether, um it’s a UK governmental organisation, I think it is, and I’ll probably send you an e-mail if I may, with some information, with the screenshots and the information that you’d need…”

Meaning this operation is either going to end up in a private prosecution or a crown prosecution, as it is pseudo official.

Obviously both would fail and I can collapse the case when I like, which is why I am writing about it on LinkedIn as it provides a unique opportunity to look at how

GOVERNMENTS REGULARLY ENGAGE IN CRIMINAL FRAUD BASED ON OPINION OF THE SHEEPLE, IF THEY THINK THEY CAN GET AWAY WITH IT.

UNFORTUNATELY NOT IN MY CASE BECAUSE I HAVE THE RECOVERED THE FORENSIC EVIDENCE FROM THE BALLSED-UP OPERATION THAT A GOVERNMENT WOULD SUPPRESS BY CLOSED MATERIAL PROCEDURES 🙂

JDS – “I’m sure foolish people, who have a low level interpretation of what I do… CRYPTOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY, CLIENTS, [BANK] ACCOUNTS, in the past and in the present, is obviously trying to make a case out of something…”

The cryptographic technology is an interesting form of Asset. Clients are of course obfuscated but are not criminals (though everyone is interested) and Bank Accounts is the money laundering angle.

For money laundering cases work because the source of the funds, or the activities themselves are unlawful – in my case they are merely confidential.

Returning to this phrase

JDS – “but this cloak and dagger approach is causing massive amounts of losses.

Obviously means that:-

MILITARY INTELLIGENCE IS BEING USED IN INVESTIGATION LAW ENFORCEMENT ISSUES TO AHEAD OF A SPECIFIC TECHNIQUE CALLED:-

* * REIDERSTVO * *

WHICH IS CORPORATE RAIDING, RUSSIAN STYLE 🙂

No, not Gangnam Style – RUSSIAN STYLE !!

Getting closer:-

MILITARY INTELLIGENCE IS BEING USED IN INVESTIGATIVE LAW ENFORCEMENT ISSUES TO AHEAD OF A SPECIFIC TECHNIQUE CALLED

* * REIDERSTVO * *

What is Reiderstovo?

The substantive text below is from Chatham House

  • The illicit acquisition of a business or part of a business in Russia (known as reiderstvo or asset-grabbing) is widespread and one of the risks of doing business there.
  • The common ingredients of reiderstvo are

Meaning that:-

the complicity of any or all of the tax, security, law-enforcement and judicial authorities,

[MEANING CRIMINAL FRAUD BY OFFICIAL STATE ACTORS]

  • and the

use of charges that are either freely invented or examples of the highly selective use of accusations that could have been levelled at many other business people but were not.

[THIS IS A MIXTURE OF STREET THEATRE, MOBBING AND ‘TALKING UP A CASE WHICH HAS ZERO PROSPECTS OF SUCCESS’. IT SERVES AS A TECHNIQUE TO ISOLATE THE TARGET AND DEPRIVE THEM OF THEIR SUPPORT INFRASTRUCTURE.]

  • Reiderstvo is made possible by corruption and contributes to market-entry barriers and the insufficient restructuring of incumbent firms. 
  • The lack of protection of property rights that makes reiderstvo possible is one of the risks that make investment in Russia less attractive than it would otherwise be. This contributes to the modest level of fixed investment as a share of GDP, to the net outflow of private capital in all post-Soviet years except in 2005–07 and to the weakness of competition. The disincentives to invest apply to foreign as well as Russian firms.

[ACCORDINGLY FROM 2009 IF NOT BEFORE ASSETS STRUCTURE WERE PUT IN PLACE IN ORDER TO WITHSTAND A WORLDWIDE MAREVA INJUNCTION. CLEARLY THAT PREDATES ANYTHING RELATED TO THE PRESENT OBVIOUSLY.]

  • Since early 2012 the phenomenon of asset-grabbing has been widely publicized in the Russian media, and calls to reform law enforcement and the courts, and to protect property rights have become commonplace.
  • Reiderstvo has elicited significant civil resistance. Business associations have played a role in launching counter-measures. The state has intervened to try and guide the campaign against reiderstvo but it does not monopolise that campaign as it does the broader, official ‘anti-corruption campaign’.
  • At the same time, developments over the amnesty for economic crimes, the role of commercial courts and the management of tax charges show just how powerful the forces ranged in favour of the status quo can be.

Reiderstvo: Asset-Grabbing in Russia

Dmitry Feoktistov, deputy director of the Department of New Challenges and Threats of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and co-chair of the G20 Anti-Corruption Working Group, attends the briefing 'The Fight against Corruption on the G20 Agenda'...

Royal United Services Institute has produced an absolutely excellent document in relation to this phenomenon.:-

201707 - rusi corporate raiding in russia lain

Occasional Paper Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies Corporate Raiding in Russia Tackling the Legal, Semi-Le...

Corker Binning

Andrew Smith of Corker Binning has written an excellent article about this:-

The Vintskevich extradition and its implications for UK/Russian relations | Lexology

Last week 32 year old Maxim Vintskevich became the first person in a decade to be successfully extradited from the UK to Russia. The Prosecutor…

IN MY CASE IT IS NOT RUSSIA 🙂

Human Rights Issues are always a factor:-

“UK’s extradition courts refused these extradition requests on the basis of concerns that the criminal proceedings were politically motivated and that the human rights of the individuals sought would be violated, either in Russia’s prisons and/or its criminal courts. Extradition judges and lawyers became familiar with some of the common hallmarks of these proceedings, including zakaznoye ugolovnoye delo (“a criminal prosecution to order”), telefonnoe pravo (“telephone justice”) and reiderstvo (“corporate raiding”). “

“Moreover in 2012 there were 75 findings by the ECtHR that Russia was in violation of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (“the Convention”), the article that prohibits torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment. These findings account for just over 25% of the total number of Article 3 violations found against all contracting states last year. “

“At the beginning of 2012 the ECtHR handed down such a pilot judgment in Ananyev & others v Russia. The Court described Russian prisons as a “recurrent structural problem” and annexed a list of 90 other judgments finding violations of Article 3, commenting that: “the set of facts underlying these violations was substantially similar: detainees suffered inhuman and degrading treatment on account of an acute lack of personal space in their cells, a shortage of sleeping places, unjustified restrictions on access to natural light and air, and non-existent privacy when using the sanitary facilities.” The Court then went on to say that Article 3 compliance required that: 

  1. Each detainee must have an individual sleeping place in the cell;

     

  2. Each detainee must have at his disposal at least three square metres of floor space; and

     

  3. The overall surface of the cell must be such as to allow the detainees to move freely between furniture. 

The relevance of the above text (which is the another nexus between the Rhodium Reiderstvo and the Psychiatric Fraud) is this recording:-

HNR – “Does he have his own room, there’s no issue with him going to the toilet is there?”

EDS – “At the hospital? Single room with air-conditioning, television… and his room is comfortable, almost like our lounge.

The real basis of the HMRC form fraud should be relevant now:-

The 'HMRC Form Fraud' and How a CHIS Obtained My Signature Through Deception

Please add me to your connections and read other unusual articles relating to Information Security, Forensics, and Fundamental Human Rights...

the LK RTA Fraud:-

The Nexus Between the UK CHIS Fraud and the LK RTA Fraud

Please add me to your connections and read other unusual articles relating to Information Security, Forensics, and Fundamental Human Rights...

Nick Sevdalis’ phone calls, as in this article:-

Destruction of Evidence and Perversion of the Course of Justice

20171006 UPDATE - FORENSIC EVIDENCE CONFIRMING THIRD PARTIES Notwithstanding the FACT that parties had OBVIOUSLY entered my house, and had stolen...

One attorney is Nick Sevdalis and I have hundreds of calls with him spilling the beans and using signature themes which confirms his involvement as an accessory after the fact. His ‘reasonable assessment’ of what is actually going on derives from an associated party (to the fraud) informing him of the information:-

As I stated “Unfortunately my idiot parents have got themselves involved, and there is plenty of evidence demonstrating.. you know they’re saying that no-one else was in the house, and the stuff is missing so, ergo it’s them.

Sevdalis responds “That’s right, I understand that whilst you’re out they have been in there… and documentation or records is missing, which have been taken.”

He pretends he does not know anything [for definite], but confirms his own theory “If your parents came and did that.. organised it and probably really directed it.. they were trying to have you shut away.. and then are they trying to look at.. someone trying to get your records to try and see what’s going on, they’re not sure… they don’t know?”

[still writing this…]

This interesting case continues…

Joseph-S-R-de-Saram

Joseph S R de Saram (JSRDS)

Information Security Architect / Intelligence Analyst / Computer Scientist / Human Rights Activist / COMSEC / SIGINT / TSCM
RHODIUM GROUP